Don't get me wrong, I'm happy with Griffin. Tough player from a winning culture/system and has some versatility. If we're in the market for a genuine backup hooker but, which it appears we are looking at Griffin/Lichaa/Rein, I'd be leaning towards Lichaa and giving him the green light to play attacking eyes up footy from dummy half which made him one of the best emerging hookers not long ago when Dogs poached him.
Griffin will certainly add some value to our team, but I think we have enough backrowers in Guerra, Buhrer, Mata'utia, Barnett and Fitzgibbon. Personally, I wouldn't have Griffin as a backrower over any of them, so that versatility is somewhat moot unless we get injuries. Those guys should all be locks for first grade and you've got buckley's carrying more than 5 backrowers in your 17 (3 starters, 2 on the bench). We also have Buhrer who has that game day versatility to play hooker if need be. I think finding a genuine hooker who's not a zero in attack to backup Levi (even if he's playing Super Cup) is more valuable than picking up a makeshift hooker/backrower to play that role.
But I digress. I do like the addition of Griffin if it comes to fruition, just what it appears we're looking for and the makeup of our squad atm, I'd lean a different way after watching Lichaa the past month. I think he's got untapped potential in the right system under the right coach.