Myles signs with Titans

When are the Knights actually going to sign someone?

When are you going to stop asking the same thing in every thread?

Just saying.

RE: Myles

Would be super if he came to the Knights. Has his off field trouble but under Bennett will be fine.

Would play him at lock.
 
Would it be possible Bennett told Edwards to have a chat to Myles? We know Bennett and TSG had a meeting the other day to talk recruitment and retention and now we're talking to Myles? If thats the case, it's been well known if Bennett wants a player, he'll get that player.
 
Last edited:
Probably, I dont know why he couldn't talk to the journo who was trying to ask him a question but ?
 
Myles has had his trouble with the Sydney media, I'm guessing he just didn't want to discuss anything or has completely had it with Sydney.

At least Edwards made a quick comment.

They were caught in the act, in Myle's case, once again.

Of course, it's obvious now we'd have some sort of approval from Bennett to target certain players.
 
When are you going to stop asking the same thing in every thread?

Just saying.

RE: Myles

Would be super if he came to the Knights. Has his off field trouble but under Bennett will be fine.

Would play him at lock.

Prop or nothing....Dont need another lock...whatsoever.
 
Agree, we already have backrowers who can fill in at prop (Costigan and Housten), Myles although a better version of these two isnt the size we need. Our side really lacks an enforcer, a guy who knows how to use his size. Snowden is this guy.
 
Not convinced on Myles myself. Our backrow stocks are pretty decent, especially with some juniors to come through and I just think Snowden is a better all round pick up
 
Yeh sure thing, choose some more fringeys over rep players.

Luckily TSG are running the show now.
:lol:Exactly. Some people seem to be more content with average first grade players than representative, big name players.
 
Well Hilder has resigned for two years anyway.

And Offers a back up to the hooking role. So even though Myles is the better player, he wouldnt be as valuable to our team as Hilder IMO.
 
I would more than content keeping Hilder over Nate, Every team needs a work horse and Hilder is ours. Hilder defence is as good as anyones and he will ruck the ball when needed. I would be preety unhappy if we had too cut Hilder for Nate, he is not under performed at all since coming to us and puts in EVERY game, unlike Nate who will go missing.
 
Well Hilder has resigned for two years anyway.

And Offers a back up to the hooking role. So even though Myles is the better player, he wouldnt be as valuable to our team as Hilder IMO.

Good post, hit the nail on the head.
 
Yeh sure thing, choose some more fringeys over rep players.

Luckily TSG are running the show now.

What the same fringe player that is statiscally one of the best on the field. That is one of our best players. One of the most underrated players in the game. One of the unluckiest players to not have been picked for rep games.

Tries his heart out every game. Even though half the time he's playing a position even he admits he isnt great at, cos our primary hooker cant stay unjuried for more then 2 games in a row.

Averages 35 tackles and 82metres in 62 minutes a game, defensivelesy solid and equal to or better then Myles.

The only difference is Hilder is a hard working loyal and verstible player that is not dumping in public or in the paper every other season for some offence.

Myles would be a good addition in our prop rotation, but playing him at lock when he have more then a few who play it already and having him in return for losing Hilder who is out performing him on the field is just stupid.

Oh and just because Myles has played rep and Hilder hasnt doesnt make Myles a better player. You should well know there are players who play rep that shouldn't have and players who havent and should have...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top