I guess we will see the NRL Judiciary's consistency this week. Noway that was a bad as Thurstons, didnt deserve a (possible) 8-point try.
Thurstons was after the try had been scored, Sowards was before, the boot nowhere near the head (knee maybe), and there was nowhere near the risk of injury to inglis as there was to the wolfman
Thurstons was after the try had been scored, Sowards was before, the boot nowhere near the head (knee maybe), and there was nowhere near the risk of injury to inglis as there was to the wolfman
Last edited: