I think the injury he may have been referring to is when he slid down that railing in town....remember? It was at the very beginning of pre season.
Or I may be way off the mark too.
Yeah it was on the night of the 4 nations final, Nov 15th
I think the injury he may have been referring to is when he slid down that railing in town....remember? It was at the very beginning of pre season.
Or I may be way off the mark too.
Yes. At the time it was reported as being an injury that could see him miss a lot of the pre season at least.I think the injury he may have been referring to is when he slid down that railing in town....remember? It was at the very beginning of pre season.
Or I may be way off the mark too.
80k is minimum, but if mamo and gagai stay neither of then should be in the top 25
I think we will be re-signing more than we'll be losing
Re-sign: Gagai, Mata'utias x 3, Snowden, Sims, Mamo, Togiatasi, Yates, Redman, Fitzgibbon, Feeney
Release: Gidley, Fa'alogo, Smith, Filipo, Elias, Newton, Steele, Pakau
The only way we re-sign them is to lose Gids. His money alone should be able to extend all Mata'utias, Mamo's and Gagai's contracts alone. An extra 200k for Gagai, extra 300k for Sione, the other brothers should have their contracts stay similar to what they are maybe an extra 50k each, 100k extra for Mamo.
Probably way off but it makes sense to me.
I saw an interview with Yates where he said he covered for Birch in the centres and enjoyed having room to move.Yeah, I want to give him a chance as well but I have to agree.
Yates certainly looks the goods. I really liked him in the front row last year but I thought he flourished even more at lock on Saturday with the bit of extra freedom. He was a constant threat in attack which I haven't ever seen from him. He's always been pretty damaging, but not to that level.
Best thing would be to sort out Gagai ASAP, if he's going to go, let him go now so we know what money we have and we know if there's a spot vacant. I'm worried we will work to keep all three, Gagai will decide to leave in August or something and Mata'utia and Mamo will have left already cos they can't see extra money or a spot being available. Then we have
Yes. At the time it was reported as being an injury that could see him miss a lot of the pre season at least.
As with all contract situations, depends on what they are asking. They both seem to be guys who are asking too much if you believe reports. Pat wants firstgrade money and he isn't yet a firstgrader, and Gagai wants rep standard money, and he isn't really a rep player yet.If you had to re-sign one of them, who would it be?
As with all contract situations, depends on what they are asking. They both seem to be guys who are asking too much if you believe reports. Pat wants firstgrade money and he isn't yet a firstgrader, and Gagai wants rep standard money, and he isn't really a rep player yet.
As a general rule, if they are good value for money, i'd prefer players who have a long history with the club as juniors. Wayne Bennett tried to buy any quality locals he could from other clubs, and pretty much all his premierships with Brisbane and Saints have been won with largely local squads, because when the big games come around you need to be playing for more than money.
For that reason, if the Mataútia brothers can be signed for the sort of money they are actually worth, they would be guys i'd like to see signed by the club, and Pat in particular has shown he will put in extra effort to win us titles.
The problem is, the brothers seem to be wanting more than they are currently worth if you believe reports.
In short, if we can get a local to do the job for the right sort of money, i'd go for the local, because they win premierships, and mercenary sides might get you to the finals, but they don't win them.