Didn't take unders last time .Got Origen money before he played Origen . Club has always looked after him money wise . Always been injury prone. If he goes he goes!So if the rumours are true he’s only offered $700K by the club that is very disappointing. He’s currently on 750K his current contract, which he took unders. Surely the club should have set aside at least 800K for him. I’ll be devastated if we lose him.
And then the wage creep begins again and we become a meh clubSo if the rumours are true he’s only offered $700K by the club that is very disappointing. He’s currently on 750K his current contract, which he took unders. Surely the club should have set aside at least 800K for him. I’ll be devastated if we lose him.
Is there a chance his been offered 700k on todays cap with a ratchet? 25% increase in cap would take that to around 875k. New deal wont be in effect until new cap is in play.So if the rumours are true he’s only offered $700K by the club that is very disappointing. He’s currently on 750K his current contract, which he took unders. Surely the club should have set aside at least 800K for him. I’ll be devastated if we lose him.
With the way we play the game? Im not sure this holds. Best put on the most try assists by any player in the team this season and the only non spine player in the comp to do so for their respective team.If you’re going to lose players, outside backs are the ones to lose. Would love to keep him, but a centre is much more replaceable than the spine and a quality forward pack.
Hunt reminds me of one those players that play 24 games a year, that is criminally underrated. Obviously gotta be a decent player first and foremost but we’re taking a 24 gamer Hunt over a 16 gamer Bradman same price tag? Give Hunt another season, I think most will.With the way we play the game? Im not sure this holds. Best put on the most try assists by any player in the team this season and the only non spine player in the comp to do so for their respective team.
If we want to win a comp I reckon Best is very close to essential. And why let Best go? It'll cost us $700k just to keep Hunt.
All our most expensive players are signed long term. Im not understanding why we wouldn't attempt to sign Best on a 1 or 2 year extension so that his contract ends with Sharpe in 28' - we only need him for another season or two anyway
We don't have to keep playing the same style no matter what though. A stronger forward pack next year should mean we aren't so reliant on long range tries.With the way we play the game? Im not sure this holds. Best put on the most try assists by any player in the team this season and the only non spine player in the comp to do so for their respective team.
If we want to win a comp I reckon Best is very close to essential. And why let Best go? It'll cost us $700k just to keep Hunt.
All our most expensive players are signed long term. Im not understanding why we wouldn't attempt to sign Best on a 1 or 2 year extension so that his contract ends with Sharpe in 28' - we only need him for another season or two anyway
If you’re going to lose players, outside backs are the ones to lose. Would love to keep him, but a centre is much more replaceable than the spine and a quality forward pack.
A stronger forward pack next year should mean we aren't so reliant on long range tries.
How is Hunt costing us $700k to re-sign, what's that number based on?With the way we play the game? Im not sure this holds. Best put on the most try assists by any player in the team this season and the only non spine player in the comp to do so for their respective team.
If we want to win a comp I reckon Best is very close to essential. And why let Best go? It'll cost us $700k just to keep Hunt.
All our most expensive players are signed long term. Im not understanding why we wouldn't attempt to sign Best on a 1 or 2 year extension so that his contract ends with Sharpe in 28' - we only need him for another season or two