This comment was what I found harsh. More than half those players have at different stages had massive question marks about how to get the best out them. KP playing with 50 different spine combinations since joining us is completely nuts and has been addressed for next year but the problem presently is still there. Next week there’s going to be another change at halfback and potentially hooker. I think the riddle of Ponga has been figured out, get an average to good halfback, Ponga will tear teams apart.
Alright I’ve thought about what you said and yes, that’s fair.
To take Knights specific frustration out of it: obviously Kalyn is a super duper talented player, attacking dynamite. But there are two types of match winners.
Some match winners are the ones who are elite at the baseline stuff which gets you in position to win games - elite middle forwards obviously. Cleary. Certain backs like Dylan Edwards, Tedesco. Brian To’o.
Some match winners aren’t the ones who get you in position to win. They’re the icing on the cake. They ram home a dominant position, or they make the difference in a close contest between two great teams. Ryan Papenhyuzen. Reece Walsh. Stephen Crichton is a classic example (talking about his on field play, I know he’s a good captain). If Latrell Mitchell didn’t get himself suspended all the time, he’d be as pure an example of this as you could imagine.
Kalyn is a lot more in the second category. He doesn’t have a huge impact on our winning percentage. But by the same token he has decided tight games (our win over the Dolphins to make finals last year for example), and ripped teams apart when our team has been dominant. We have tried again and again to turn him into a “baseline” match winner, and most of his best footy for us has come when we’ve abandoned that and he’s been the icing instead. I just don’t think it’s who he is.
So, if he’s going to be the difference in us winning a premiership, we need to have way better “baseline” players. As Les says: a really good organising halfback is probably essential, for a start. Better forwards. Better backs.
This isn’t going to happen terribly quickly. We need to be smart like Canberra. Get great prospects in when they’re young. Mould them into what we need. POS’ recruitment & retention has overwhelmingly been of young emerging forwards (outside of Brown and the Sharpe extension). So it’s pretty clear that’s what we’re trying to do. No quick fixes.
But it’s going to take years. Cody Hopwood is probably our best forward prospect. He may be *four* years away from being a really good, week to week first grader. Not one or two. Four. That’s not a reflection on a lack of talent or anything. That’s just reality.
I know we don’t want to hear about rebuilds but honestly we never really did one. Not really.
In all honesty, just from Kalyn’s perspective: he’s 27. The next few years will likely be his peak years. It’s almost irresponsible to not tell the dude - hey, we think we can get where we need to be, but it’s going to be a long process. By the time we get there you may be 32 years old. Are you up for that?
No name calling, no criticism of Kalyn as a person here. But Sharpe is 21 years old. He’s a local junior. He’ll never be as expensive as Kalyn, most likely. He’s just obviously more of a natural fullback. We may undermine his career forcing him to play 6 rather than putting him in his best role. He will hit his prime pretty much exactly when, hopefully, our key young forwards really hit their straps.
Whatever you might think about Dylan Brown’s deal, it’s done now. He’s a natural 6. He’s still quite young.
I’m not saying we should pack KP up in a truck and ship him off, but we should have an honest conversation about where we’re at. It may result in him going to a club closer to truly competing for a premiership, and him holding up that trophy elsewhere. That would be hard to take. But I honestly don’t think it will happen for him in a Knights jersey, and there’s reason to believe that there’s a better chance of it happening in the future for the Knights if he’s not there.
I would rather be wrong about this than right.