Rogers or Henry?

Starting Halves for Round 1?


  • Total voters
    43
  • Poll closed .
If neither impress in the remaining trials I would hope to see:

6. Mullen
7. Gidley
 
Well i was impressed with both in the trials. Both had good moments, both had bad moments, atm Rogers is far more experienced but it's a more exciting option to chose Henry so i'm willing to reserve judgement for after the 2 next trials.
 
I'm the same with Josh, I would be happy enough to have a Rogers or Gidley there until Henry is ready to go completely.
 
It will be interesting to see how Henry goes in the trial against the Panthers and Sharks. I did hear both him and Roberts had great games against Fiji Bati but don't want to think too much of that game.
If he does continue to impress, I'll have no problems of picking him in the first grade side to take on Penrith. I'm pretty sure he wouldn't have come here if he didn't think he would get a good opportunity at First Grade
Rogers I feel is a fill-in at best, and probably why we re-signed him. He played a number of great games last year because he knew his contract was up, similar to Chris Bailey.
To answer the question though Mullen/Henry
 
Went Henry, just because I feel that Dodge is inconsistent and we need fresh blood in the halves.

Also, I have Henry on the bench in Supercoach for Rd 1.
 
I hope they start with 6. Mullen 7. Henry and stick with them! I wouldnt like them to start with mullen/gidley as i dont like wes or mcdonnel at the back and i am not really a fan of rogers at 6..he'd be a good backup though.
 
We know what we're going to get with Rogers, inconstancy. He's been given chance after chance and has only capitalized every so often. Henry is one of the most talented young halves in the business, he needs to be given his chance to show everyone what he can do otherwise what's the point in having him. He's worked his *** off for a shot to play first grade, we brought him here to play first grade so he should be playing first grade lol

He doesn't have to be the #1 playmaker, noone has colossal expectations from him, if he can just string together some decent games, build confidence and form a nice partnership with Mullen that's more than we could ask for at this stage. Henry and Mullen are our future, I don't see the point in putting such an important combination on hold. They need to be at a top level by next year and beyond when we recruit these new players and really challenge for the premiership. Rogers should not be in our future plans whatsoever (no disrespect to him.)
 
Last edited:
Henry & Mullo.

Didnt see the point in re-signing Dodge for an extra two years in the first place tbh.
 
I think
7- Mullen
6- Gidley
and play Shan Odonnell at fullback , save Beu Henry for an injury in the back line then we can move Gidley out and slot Henry in
 
Henry / Mullen at this stage but we'll see how their trial form is and if Henry is at least on par with Rogers then I'd give the young fella first option!
 
Henry & Mullo.

Didnt see the point in re-signing Dodge for an extra two years in the first place tbh.

Just depth really. Tbh it was better then keeping Dureau. He was pretty bad in his ESL debut, though I know Rogers is no better heh.
Considering its 2 years and assuming we keep Roberts, by then both he would have developed better physically and be able to cover 5/8 if needed. Rogers incase we have a bad injury run or Mullen plays Origin by some chance, though not likely.
He's probably not on much anyway
 
Couldn't say with any confidence really.

We have no real idea how Henry is going/how he will go in the NRL and it's too much to say if he'll be ready for it straight up. Just hopefully they don't do what theyve done to every half that's come through our ranks by throwing them into a fire.

I like Rogers personally as a clubman, wish he'd fit in somewhere into the side, but serious inconsistency seems to be his undoing.
 
I am definitely for mullo and henry but what about roberts from what I have seen in the trials he has a good head on his shoulders, I don't see Rogers as a halves player more a ball playing lock.
 
Roberts has been the most impressive of all of them but he's only 19 & i think he would be behind Gids, Mullo, Henry, Stig & Rogers in Rick Stone's mind.
 
Isn't half the reason we bought Henry was to make him into a first grade play maker? Pritty sure that Rogers is only their as back-up.
 
Halves must deliever for Knights

NEWCASTLE coach Rick Stone claims the performances of Ben Rogers and rookie Beau Henry over the next fortnight will determine whether he needs to start the NRL season with skipper Kurt Gidley in the halves.

Rogers and Henry, who arrives after two seasons playing in the Toyota Cup with St George Illawarra, will have two trial matches to battle it out for the right to wear No. 6 jumper alongside halfback Jarrod Mullen when the Knights open their premiership campaign against Penrith on March 13.
Should they fail to impress, Gidley looms as an option in the halves, despite Stone admitting his preference is for the NSW State of Origin utility to wear the No. 1 jumper.


But Gidley, who captained the Blues during the 2010 series, faces stiff competition to earn a starting berth this year with Parramatta's Jarryd Hayne and exciting Canberra Raiders star Josh Dugan pressing for the NSW fullback role.

If shifted to the halves, Gidley would then find himself in a battle with the likes of Knights teammate Mullen and Sydney Roosters duo Todd Carney and Mitchell Pearce for the five-eighth and halfback spots.

Stone will use tonight's trial match against Penrith in Port Macquarie and next week's game against Cronulla at Muswellbrook to get a clearer picture of his team's key roles.

"A lot will depend on Ben Rogers and Beau Henry and blokes like Shannon McDonnell and Wes Naiqama and whoever else can play fullback," Stone said yesterday.

"I think Beau Henry and Ben Rogers, in the next couple of weeks, have got a couple of big games in front of them, there's no doubt about that, to push their barrow and stake their claims to be there the first week when we play Penrith."

Which makes tonight's trial at Port Macquarie all the more important, given it is against their round-one opponents.

Gidley will sit out the match as Stone gives all his other aspirants a chance to perform, with McDonnell's performance at fullback also influencing the coach's thoughts.

Rogers will be looking to bounce back from a 2010 season blighted by injury and indifferent form, but by far the most intriguing piece of the puzzle is Henry, who at one stage was being groomed by master coach Wayne Bennett to take over the halfback jumper at St George Illawarra.

Despite being named the 2009 Toyota Cup player of the year, Henry never got a look-in at the Dragons, mainly due to the brilliant form and injury-free run of first-choice halves Ben Hornby and Jamie Soward.

There were also lingering questions over Henry's temperament, but Stone said the 21-year-old had done everything asked of him since arriving at Newcastle.

"He's young and most young players have still got a bit to learn abou
t the whole professional full-time thing," the Newcastle mentor said.

"He's coming back from a shoulder reconstruction and I give him the credit that he's worked particularly hard to get himself in a position where he played last weekend in that trial against Fiji which was under the six-month mark.

"He's done a lot of extras to make that happen and at least he's going to give himself a genuine chance now by playing three games before the competition starts."

Stone said players such as Gidley, Akuila Uate and Chris Houston would return to play in the last trial against Cronulla next Saturday.

The Panthers will return home to Centrebet Stadium next Saturday when they take on local rivals Parramatta in their final trial match of 2011.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...iver-for-knights/story-e6frexnr-1226008488658
 
Back
Top