The club either wants Ponga to stay or to go. There's no in between.
If the club wants him, it makes it extraordinarily difficult for him to be having meaningful conversations with other NRL clubs. Yes, Ponga may turnaround tomorrow and request a release 'on compassionate grounds' following which contract terms will suspiciously and immediately emerge, but for a player of his calibre and attention, the player would need to really want to leave for a scenario like this to be realistic. Otherwise competing clubs risk being caught making unsolicited advances towards a core asset of another club. For all the talk about it, an affair of that magnitude rarely takes place. Anyone have examples of this happening?
The only realistic scenario is one where the club has informally and discretely granted permission to Ponga to speak (off the record) to other clubs. But why the **** would POS, Holbrook or the board want Ponga playing elsewhere? We now have a well balanced squad around our key man, the club needs the player now more than ever imo because we now have the nucleus of a squad that may enter a prem window if the stars align over the next 3-4 years.
No club can pay him more than we will. So if he goes it'll be for the prospect of immediate success. The Roosters have Teddy at 1. That leaves The Dogs? Who else has the money and the position available? And the dogs dont have the money, yet.