I agree with all that, but I still stand by it being our best halves performance of the year haha.
Yeah and a fair few of his usual poorly disguised hospital balls and passes to nobody. All his really good stuff happened when the game was already won, besides backing up KP for a try, but if we’re giving him a massive pat on the back for doing that that’s a bit of an indictment on the team as a whole.
At the risk of stating the obvious…..if that’s our best halves performance then…..I agree with all that, but I still stand by it being our best halves performance of the year haha.
We can only play what’s in front of us. That’s the most points we have put on all season. Look I hope we get Pezet, I will be surprised if Hastings is there next year. By all accounts the playing is not happy with him.Gamble vs Dolphins
Hastings vs Warriors
Gamble vs Tigers (two weeks ago!)
Arguably both Hastings & Cogger vs the Dragons
Pryce vs Eels
Just off the top of my head. All better performances.
I can’t believe I’m on the other side of this after initially looking on the bright side of the result on the basis that at least we put away a bad side rather than labouring to a 16-12 win, but that Souths mob played worse against us than anyone else has this year, and Cogger’s best moments came when they had long since given up.
Also I can’t believe he’s getting the wraps he is for his kicking game. Explain what was better in this game about handing the ball back to the other team on their 20 near the sideline with a meek chip kick, compared to all the other games where we’ve been doing it, other than it being a game we happened to win and our chasers were sometimes contesting said kicks?
Let's break down that 68 Fantasy points and account for his 2 try scoring momentsI never said let’s make him half back. But, 68 fantasy points tells me he played better for more than just 15mins. As I said credit we’re credit is due! And maybe I’m willing for him to come good for the sake of us all. Hopefully he can back up good performances the next two games.
Yes, hopefully he does improve if he is our best option next year.I don't think anyone is saying he is the 2nd coming of Joey.
Just that he had his best game for us which is a positive.
There is also a possibility we don't sign a half and he is the 7 to start next year. So hopefully he improves.
He could have given his usual 3 word answer.Well what was Kalyn going to say? “Yeah Jack’s kinda mid, I wish I could play with DCE”? Be serious.
The answer to Cogger vs Hastings vs Gamble is “If we get Pezet back, and someone like Pryce or Sharpe gets to a level we want at five-eighth, then none of them.”
What are you talking about? You judge a half the same way you would judge anyone on the field - by watching the game and their impact on it. (Rather than fantasy points...)How do you judge the impact of an organising half?
Everyone has seemed happy with what Hastings has added as an organising half for the last few years, despite it being pretty hard to define what he did that had impact.
What did Cogs bring this week - the first time I think he was the genuine organiser?
Ponga said he liked having Cogs giving him directions, and Ponga had a pretty good game I thought, so that seemed to work.
Anyway, without knowing what Cogs was saying and doing during the game, I don't know how you can judge his impact, other than we had a pretty good game with Cogs running the show.
If we have two more good games and make the finals with Cogs calling the tunes, I'll think it's working for us.
Surely they have to look at developing Sharpe at 5/6 during the off season?Look, I won’t harp on it. He is what he is.
The answer to Cogger vs Hastings vs Gamble is “If we get Pezet back, and someone like Pryce or Sharpe gets to a level we want at five-eighth, then none of them.”
Is Pezet better than what we have, currently Hastings, Cogger, Crosslands and Sutton, are we going to pay more for an equivalent player, has anyone been following Pezet, is he getting better or are we going to pay big bucks for basic half while continuing to pay big dollars for Hastings and Cogger for another season or two, I know in years term he has potential but so does Sutton and a few other Flegg age players.Look, I won’t harp on it. He is what he is.
The answer to Cogger vs Hastings vs Gamble is “If we get Pezet back, and someone like Pryce or Sharpe gets to a level we want at five-eighth, then none of them.”
Who said Cogger won us that game?What are you talking about? You judge a half the same way you would judge anyone on the field - by watching the game and their impact on it. (Rather than fantasy points...)
How anyone could watch last week and conclude 'it's Cogger what won it' will forever baffle me.