Why not bothCrouch is a better player from what I've seen.
Potentially, at first receiver for backline shape, it could be something very basic but effective for us.Dylan Brown is going to be a great signing. The shapes he runs and gets into the line is what we are lacking and also a running threat
Because he's signed next year, don't have to worry about the Knights not prioritising a leaving player (not that I think that would be a problem). Can get him into the club's culture before pre-season.What is the point of signing a player (Bryan) before 30 June who is unable to play due to a shoulder injury?
Good question. My guess is it needed to happen like that to free up a spot for Arthur?What is the point of signing a player (Bryan) before 30 June who is unable to play due to a shoulder injury?
Can't transfer this year after 30 June (I believe), and Manly must be confident of having him healthy before end of year.What is the point of signing a player (Bryan) before 30 June who is unable to play due to a shoulder injury?
Even with Bryan leaving?Someone else would need to make way to fit Da Silva in before June 30.
Can see Jones thriving as an Atkinson replacement in the 14 jersey.Bit of movement in the last 48 hours according to the Telegraph:
- Doesn't talk about the Jake Arthur move as a done deal but it's a safe bet with Toohey reporting it
- Lachlan Crouch back to the Knights immediately
- Riley Jones gone to Cronulla
- Also says Knights blocked an approach from Manly for Jack Hetherington
Not a bad result for us. Depth in halves and forwards for the cost of a utility in Jones and a prop with a busted shoulder.Bit of movement in the last 48 hours according to the Telegraph:
- Doesn't talk about the Jake Arthur move as a done deal but it's a safe bet with Toohey reporting it
- Lachlan Crouch back to the Knights immediately
- Riley Jones gone to Cronulla
- Also says Knights blocked an approach from Manly for Jack Hetherington