2017/2018 Knights Player signing speculation

Status
Not open for further replies.
So the Broncos will have Bird $1M, Milf $1M and Boyd at least $1M+ next year inside a salary cap of $9M leaving only $6M for the other 27 players. How the hell can they do that? Did they hire Andrew Gee again to do the books?
 
Possible if you put average or unproven players around them but then you look who they have....
I would not count Adam Blair, Matt Gillet, Alex Glenn, Jordan Kahu, Andrew McCullough, Josh McGuire, Corey Oates, James Roberts, Sam Thiaday (maybe Korbin Sims) all average unproven players. That makes 10 players, then another 17 on top of that.
 
Well Blake Ferguson we should make some sort of play at him. No overs but would be handy


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
So the Broncos will have Bird $1M, Milf $1M and Boyd at least $1M+ next year inside a salary cap of $9M leaving only $6M for the other 27 players. How the hell can they do that? Did they hire Andrew Gee again to do the books?

Third party payments are also included in that. Not all coming out of the salary cap.

Broncos have the most advantages in the comp yet still haven't won the comp in over a decade. They should be winning it every 2 years.
 
Third party payments are also included in that. Not all coming out of the salary cap.

Broncos have the most advantages in the comp yet still haven't won the comp in over a decade. They should be winning it every 2 years.

While I am aware there are two types of TPA, I was under the impression that the ones that aren't under the salary cap weren't supposed to be arranged before a player signed a deal or influence his decision because there is more money involved. They were only supposed to be arranged after the player has signed. And anything TPA arranged to sway a players decision should be included in the cap.
Which is why I find it weird how the Bird deal went down with the Broncos arranging a last minute TPA to get him over there.

If I'm not mistaken shouldn't that also count under the salary cap?

If say, Bird was offered $950k at the sharks and $850k at the Broncos, but he took the lesser money to play under Wayne Bennett or whatever, signed the contract...then say "XYZ Inc" a month later that has zero affiliation with the Broncos approached his manager saying "we want to sponsor/pay you for $150k, be a guest speaker at our functions, have our name attached when your name is read out at home games" then I understand that would be fair game

But if the Broncos were interested in Bird and say the Sharks offered 900k, the Knights offered $1m, and the Broncos in their 'cap' could only afford $800k but then said to his manager 'look we can only pay you 800k, but you'll get $300k from ABC Inc over each year, to be a guess speaker at functions and endorse our brand' then my understanding that is the illegal part and must also be included in the cap even if they don't want to.

How is it fair if this last minute TPA the Broncos used isn't counted in the cap? When the Sharks didn't have. Unless those rules have changed since then.
 
So those mentioned would be like 400 salary 600 club funded "tpa" haha

Bird is 700k cap, 300k TPA. Widely reported Broncs have north of $2m in TPAs.

The Broncos can legitimately offer Bird $700k and tell his manager XYZ Inc are interested in providing a TPA. They are not meant to have any more to do with it than that, but how do you police it?

I'm in favour of TPAs, getting more money into the game is a good thing. If the Raiders and Cows can get in on the scam in the two smallest markets in the comp we just need to be smarter.
 
Last edited:
So the Broncos will have Bird $1M, Milf $1M and Boyd at least $1M+ next year inside a salary cap of $9M leaving only $6M for the other 27 players. How the hell can they do that? Did they hire Andrew Gee again to do the books?

It's pretty epic alright, shame they won't bring back Schubert, guy was a real piece of work but seemed to keep people in line.
 
Far out mate his a current Australian rep and looks classy in the jumper, will go for big $$$$. As well would we want the Mundine stable near Newie?

Most clubs are close to the cap already may not need to pay as much as normal I wouldn't want to pay too much for him but atleast may an offer. Yeah not keen on Mundine at all.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Trouble here is not enough companies and Rich people backing our club a couple of years ago the Bronco's came out and said they were turning people away that wanted to help with TPA's ...If the people there want to help theyre team like that good on them , I certainly wouldn't begrudge us that situation if it was the other way around ....I read today that Gagai is seriously considering Melbourne but where does that leave Will Chambers who is also off contract ...
 
Trouble here is not enough companies and Rich people backing our club a couple of years ago the Bronco's came out and said they were turning people away that wanted to help with TPA's ...If the people there want to help theyre team like that good on them , I certainly wouldn't begrudge us that situation if it was the other way around ....I read today that Gagai is seriously considering Melbourne but where does that leave Will Chambers who is also off contract ...

Maybe they play gags in the halves?
 
I would want Ferguson in our back line and pay what ever he is on right now

Watching the AUS vs NZ game got me thinking. It would be great to have some taller ctr/wings for our halves to kick too. I really hope we can get graham and skd cheap. I.e if Graham is on a million dollar contract at the dogs I hope we can get away with paying 3/4 of that 750k. Maybe wishful thinking. And skd after his cocaine stuff hopefully we could drop 100k off his contract because of that. I like gagai but I think we need to let him go of he starts asking $700k + to play centre.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top