Third party payments are also included in that. Not all coming out of the salary cap.
Broncos have the most advantages in the comp yet still haven't won the comp in over a decade. They should be winning it every 2 years.
While I am aware there are two types of TPA, I was under the impression that the ones that aren't under the salary cap weren't supposed to be arranged before a player signed a deal or influence his decision because there is more money involved. They were only supposed to be arranged after the player has signed. And anything TPA arranged to sway a players decision should be included in the cap.
Which is why I find it weird how the Bird deal went down with the Broncos arranging a last minute TPA to get him over there.
If I'm not mistaken shouldn't that also count under the salary cap?
If say, Bird was offered $950k at the sharks and $850k at the Broncos, but he took the lesser money to play under Wayne Bennett or whatever, signed the contract...then say "XYZ Inc" a month later that has zero affiliation with the Broncos approached his manager saying "we want to sponsor/pay you for $150k, be a guest speaker at our functions, have our name attached when your name is read out at home games" then I understand that would be fair game
But if the Broncos were interested in Bird and say the Sharks offered 900k, the Knights offered $1m, and the Broncos in their 'cap' could only afford $800k but then said to his manager 'look we can only pay you 800k, but you'll get $300k from ABC Inc over each year, to be a guess speaker at functions and endorse our brand' then my understanding that is the illegal part and must also be included in the cap even if they don't want to.
How is it fair if this last minute TPA the Broncos used isn't counted in the cap? When the Sharks didn't have. Unless those rules have changed since then.