Only positive thing is extending Fitz, the rest are all reggies players because we missed out on the big fish
Ok I’ll take your word for it haven’t seen a lot of him tbhYoung Zac is a great buy.
Watch the state cup final of the dogs vs redcliffe he was best on ground imo
I don't think Brown would have any problem with the way Levi plays IF Levi didn't make poor decisions at vital times of games I think that's the only problem Brown has with Levi .I became a fan of Zac Woolford when our under 20s would play Canberra, and it would seem a pretty even contest till Woolford decided to pull something special out of the hat and win them the game.
He isn't your typical hooker. He has vision, a kicking game, and he has a running game that isn't just sprints out of dummy half. He will get involved like a 5/8 if that is what is needed to win a game.
I'm not sure Brown will like the idea of a hooker who goes off script a lot - he doesn't like it when Levi does - but Woolford has skills he pulls out good times to win matches. I suspect Brown will beat that out of him.
I don't think Brown would have any problem with the way Levi plays IF Levi didn't make poor decisions at vital times of games I think that's the only problem Brown has with Levi .
I don’t get the hate towards Billy for not rating Brown, the jury is definitely out on him he hasn’t really proven himself in the NRL.Give it up mate you’re better off talking to a brick wall then Billy when it comes to Brown.
See that's where we differ because I think Brown is doing a great job as coach ..I don’t get the hate towards Billy for not rating Brown, the jury is definitely out on him he hasn’t really proven himself in the NRL.
See that's where we differ because I think Brown is doing a great job as coach ..
See that's where we differ because I think Brown is doing a great job as coach ..
Imagine how good we would've went if he coached them to defend.Its funny, up till rd20 ish a lot on here still thought we could make the finals and here we are screaming for more players as the current lot from last year were not good enough.
How could a poor coach have a poor roster yet still give it a decent shack for a decent part if the season with a team he's still building? Blows my mind
I don't get how this can be argued, his win record is horrific and that is what a coach is judged on, sure he hasn't had the cattle, but you can't say he can coach yet.
That will be shown one way or the other this year as all excuses are gone.