Rogers or Henry?

Starting Halves for Round 1?

  • Total voters
    43
  • Poll closed .
I'm loving all the talk about positions and who will play and who will miss a spot , it is a problem that the Knights haven't had for a few years usally injuries have solved that problem .
I think the Knights could be in with a good chance of a top 4 spot this year
 
6. Rogers
7. Henry

It's the obvious choice, I'd have thought? Our new young halfback paired with our most consistent and successful existing half.
 
carbonclay said:
I'm loving all the talk about positions and who will play and who will miss a spot , it is a problem that the Knights haven't had for a few years usally injuries have solved that problem .
I think the Knights could be in with a good chance of a top 4 spot this year
Click to expand...

Yeh, but you like it when you have a case of "how can I fit these two players in the side, one has to miss out"

This situation is more like, "Ok, so good chance is we are going to have to pick one of these two players"
 
This really is a silly question!
Why would you weaken one position to strengthen another? Leave Gidley at FB where he rules the park and come up with a halves combo from Mullen, Rogers, Henry or Roberts. You can also throw Adams into that mix & Stig could be tested too..............
I really Gidley as a player but I believe that the open spaces of FB is where he should be.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top