The Halfback Conundrum 2: Electric Halfbackloo

Who should be our first choice halfback in 2026?

  • Dylan Brown

    Votes: 8 19.0%
  • Sandon Smith

    Votes: 28 66.7%
  • Fletcher Sharpe

    Votes: 6 14.3%
  • Tyson Gamble

    Votes: 3 7.1%

  • Total voters
    42

HarVeeGee13

Danny 'Bedsy' Buderus
This probably warrants its own thread at this point rather than it derailing other discussions.

Gotta say it's a tough decision what to do, Sharpe. There's no denying FB is his best position. But FB is Kayln's best position, and while we have both, KP gets preference over Sharpe in that position. It was exciting watching Sharpe play six, but you could see he wasn't consistent and doing things that were not just natural to his game. Yes, he's a gun, and he learns quickly, so the argument could be made to play him in the halves.

Pair Sharpe up with a Jamal Forgaty, DCE, Adam Reyolds at seven, and all good Sharpe playing six. But, his half partner will be DB, and it's as clear as day he is not that kind of player. He is a six. And in my opinion, we should not try to change his game. Yes, maybe DB can slowly and naturally develop that into his game, but as of right now, trying to pair the two up is risky. Neither will be playing their natural games.
I've thought this a lot of times watching how good Ethan Strange has gone with Jamal, playing in a way which almost looks like a union centre (he averages 24 possessions of the ball per game Strange, which is comfortably the lowest for starting 6's in the NRL). If they were deadset on Sharpe playing 6, Jamal should have been the player we went hardest after.

If Kalyn walks out on us though I think we'll be glad to have Brown and Smith on the books... it all sort of sorts itself out then.
 
I want Smith @7, however I really feel for Sharpe. He is a gun. He has been working hard and improving weekly and I’d feel bad if he gets shafted back to the wing it’s a waste of talent. He needs his hands on the ball.

Plus we need to look after him, he is an elite local jr, I don’t want to see him get more $$$ and a more glamorous position to play elsewhere. He is worth way more to us than the 500ish k good wingers get. Maybe centre? Might justify paying him more.

Hopefully we know early what’s happening with KP and Sharpe will at least have a pathways back to FB should Kalyn leave (IMO he will)
 
Also not saying Sharpe will be straight up on elite money but if he keeps improving at the same trajectory he will need upgrading sooner rather than later
 
Impossible to answer without knowing the game plan the new coach is going for.

They somehow have to shoehorn all the talent in somehow. Is coach going for traditional, or continue the hybrid style.

Id like to see Smith at 7, Brown at 6, and KP in the 1 and sticking more to fullback things.

But can the new coach achieve putting the shackles on KP?
 
Plus we need to look after him, he is an elite local jr, I don’t want to see him get more $$$ and a more glamorous position to play elsewhere. He is worth way more to us than the 500ish k good wingers get. Maybe centre? Might justify paying him more.
No mail on this but I reckon Fletcher and Sandon got very similar deals. Fletcher didn’t show up on the rich list thing (any deal over $600K a season reported) and 3-4 years 500Kish seems about the going rate for someone expected to play a lot in the spine who’s regarded as a player of promise, unless it’s Souths doing the “slamming own **** in a car door” of player valuation. Then those guys get topped up and extended partway into those deals usually if they’re going well.

$500K for a very good winger is fine, and it’s a steal for a gun centre. At this stage it’s not an issue and I don’t think he’s on a wage where he’d feel hard done by.

The big thing with him is as a fullback I am very confident he’d be a guy who we’d be extending on $900Kish after one season there (think: Weekes, Bula). That’s a real dilemma we can’t ignore which has to be resolved by late 2027. It’s correct that we have to have a plan to get him into the spine. We’re not the Roosters - we can’t just keep Joey Manu at centre for years and have it be fine.

I just think we’d be better right away with two genuine halves, the more complete ball playing ability of Kalyn at 1, and players with serious weaknesses like Marzhew and Schiller not as first choice options. And a better team is better for development than a losing one, that’s the eternal balancing act - you can’t just be **** for years and wait for it to come good. The NRL doesn’t work like that.

I also think massively strengthening the pack is the real path to premiership contention in the late 2020’s/early 2030’s (hot take: an amazing pack with a good spine > amazing spine with a good pack. 24/25 Melbourne as constructed are great but the 2023 Broncos would have BELTED them IMO, and look at who the premiership favourites are this year). But you can’t just shunt Ponga out the door and sign Tino or Payne Haas the very same day. Not realistic.

It’s very very easy to say and a lot of hard work to achieve, but a seeing what we can do with the talent we have now (ie - while you have a player like Kalyn in his prime, see what you can do with him; let the next club have post-prime Kalyn), balanced with the long term development plan of allowing the best forwards to establish themselves over the next few years, allowing Kalyn to leave at the end of 2027, locking down Fletcher as his replacement on $900K-1m-ish, and then using the resulting million or so of cap space to secure players like Hopwood, McEwen, Carmichael, Lucas etc for the long haul - that’s the road to lasting success in my view.

Meanwhile I see Sandon as, at very worst, a guy who can do a good job at 7 while we allow prospects to develop underneath him. At best someone who can develop into a very good 7 like a Ben Hunt (not as dynamic as Ben, but Sandon’s boot is far more accurate than Ben’s was in his 20’s; developing that kicking game is his road to going from an okay 7 to a good one).

Arthur, the 9 we were going to develop, at a club where we already have a capable hooker/lock utility… are we just giving up on that?
 
1-Ponga
2-Young
3-Gags
4-Best
5-Sharpe
6-Brown
7-Smith
Probably looks better than what I expect we’ll start with Sharpe at 7 and Smith at hooker but I think the above is where we’ll end up.
 
Good back up Tyson. Good for the culture and glad to keep him at the club.
if hes getting paid as a NSW cup player and we dont need the space in the top 30 im happy, but hes not a player that is going to improve the club going forward.
 
Nah I’ve heard we’ve been paying him jack ****, a bit rough honestly as he’s arguably been the best of that Hastings/Gamble/Cogger cohort when fit.

Could be wrong but pretty sure Jacko in the 7-800 range, Cogger 400, Gamble we originally signed for 220ish.
 
The best spine could be
1 Ponga/ Sharpe
6 Brown
7 Smith
13 Crossland/ Gamble
9 Arthur / Crossland

14 Crossland/Gamble/Arthur

If Ponga is picked at 1 Sharpe is a very capable winger or fill in 5/8
 
Was just listening to a segment on NRL 360 talking about the difference Sexton made to the dogs when he come on the field for there finals match. The side instantly looked better. In the huddle he was the one barking orders.

Crichton being injured forced the reshuffle to bring him in and Galvin 6, Burton centre. But they screwed up dropping him for Galvin and potentially derailed there season.

What I’m getting at is Galvin is not an organising half. Sharpe and Brown are not organising halves!

Unless you are the Melbourne Storm a side needs a half that organises the team. The closest we have to that player will be Smith. No argument in my opinion. Sharpe has to play on the wing or centre. First choice FB if KP goes down/origin.
 
Back
Top