Les Misérables
Adam Woolnough
If we bottle this signing that is a HUGE error on the part of POS. Puts our short-medium term success at risk
I will be very disappointed if he doesnt come however we cannot force him to come, we offer an extra year, more money. If the club genuinely believes Smith will be better for us at 9, not sure what else POS can doIf we bottle this signing that is a HUGE error on the part of POS. Puts our short-medium term success at risk
Brown has the potential to go down as the best half bar johns for the club by the time his done here, 6 or 7.Smith is clearly a much much better half than Brown and he is light years ahead of Sharpe, if we try to make him a 9 than we are one of the most idiotic clubs in the leagues history.
He is not a better half than Brown, but Brown and Smith in the halves with Sharpe in the outside backs and all of a sudden the Knight's have one of the best back lines in the competition. The pitch really should just be we want quality players at the club and wherever you fit in you will.Smith is clearly a much much better half than Brown and he is light years ahead of Sharpe, if we try to make him a 9 than we are one of the most idiotic clubs in the leagues history.
Yep I've said this elsewhere but have been shouted down for it because apparently it's "misleading" to tell Sandon anything other than, if he's at the club he HAS to play 9, no ifs no buts.He is not a better half than Brown, but Brown and Smith in the halves with Sharpe in the outside backs and all of a sudden the Knight's have one of the best back lines in the competition. The pitch really should just be we want quality players at the club and wherever you fit in you will.
We 'can't pivot from there' if the blokes signs with the Cowboys. That's what is so asinine about it.O'Sullivan has said all along he wants two hookers in the top squad. We only have one currently with Crossland viewed as a lock, and one in the development squad. A new coach might have different views and you can pivot from there if needed, but for now the guy writing the cheques thinks Smith can/should be a hooker and sees that area as a more pressing need for the Knights, so that's what he's selling him on.
The fundamental point of disagreement I have here, right, is that while Sharpe is obviously on a different class of talent to Phoenix Crossland, Crossland has demonstrated himself to be a very capable 80 minute hooker. He understands the key requirements of the position and can perform them to an average to good standard over a full season, and then he's this very aggressive and physical defender on top of that. It has been proven that you can build a very good side with Phoenix at hooker. Conclusively.O'Sullivan has said all along he wants two hookers in the top squad. We only have one currently with Crossland viewed as a lock, and one in the development squad. A new coach might have different views and you can pivot from there if needed, but for now the guy writing the cheques thinks Smith can/should be a hooker and sees that area as a more pressing need for the Knights, so that's what he's selling him on.
He is the most talented five-eighth we have ever had at the club, by a mile. He is closer to Ponga in terms of talent than most are prepared to accept at this point. The rest of how the spine is put together should have maximising Brown & Ponga in mind. Simple as that.Brown has the potential to go down as the best half bar johns for the club by the time his done here, 6 or 7.
He is the most talented five-eighth we have ever had at the club, by a mile. He is closer to Ponga in terms of talent than most are prepared to accept at this point. The rest of how the spine is put together should have maximising these two in mind.
I believe it takes hookers a while to become solid first graders. There is a head and shoulders best in Grant, then about 6-7 that are good players. Then the rest have serviceable to bad hookers. Arthur is still only 20, hopefully he features in our NRL side next year but I think expectations should be quite low.I hope we get Sandon but question remains on Arthur.M surely? Have we gone in too strong last year thinking he was good to go? If they are throwing 4 years at Sandon, Matt only here for 2 more and would he want to always be “developing” in cup with the club looking for new hooker options?
We absolutely can pivot to other options at hooker though. We tried to sign Leo, missed and pivoted to other options at prop to replace him. Tried to sign Jonah, missed and pivoted to Brown. If we miss on Smith, we'll no doubt try to sign someone else.We 'can't pivot from there' if the blokes signs with the Cowboys. That's what is so asinine about it.
And not even POS can guarantee where Sandon would play next season under a new coach.