2026 Recruitment And Retention

I'd prefer Wishart at 9.

Im just not convinced, at all, that either of Brown or Sharpe will work at 7 and we'll end up either pushing Wishart to 7 or back in the market for a 9, assuming we miss out of Smith and sign Wishart ofc
 
I just don't see Wishart as a realistic option next year. Melbourne historically don't just let players go early for no reason. Don't see why Wishart would be an exception, he's cheap and valuable to them.
 
Well that’s ****ing stupid. He goes good at 9 but for that kind of money you want an existing specialist hooker who you know can play the full 80. Also you can find players who can do a job at 9 very cheap.

I am still far from sold on Arthur maybe his just a backup.
 
Hooker is a huge problem, Crossland is better at 13 but ok at 9, enthusiasm, Arthur isn’t ready, might never be but not ready to right him off, no sign of a young up and comer so we need to buy someone.
Nothing stands out on the market and the most likelies want to be half backs, don’t like it, can’t compete unless all spine positions are covered.
 
Agree if Authur was ready it would have more game time this year. My guess he will come off the bench. Not start. So if we don’t get anyone, eg Sandon Smith, etc. Crossy will be starting there. I’m also not sure if we do get Sandon, he’s starting either. They have to make a lot of tackles.
 
Any deal 700 and up gets on the “rich list” so we’ve got Lucas on a very good deal.

I sincerely think he’s worth what we paid Kai.

Sharpe’s deal probably pretty good then too.

Sincerely think part of how we ended at that huge number for Dylan Brown is that you have to spend 95% of the cap lmao:

-POS is sitting there with over $3 million in players he straight up does not want coming off the books.
- He knows we can replace Kai internally, the starting players we need are, therefore: a new half to replace Jackson, a new 13 to replace Elliott, a new prop to replace Leo once Leo doesn’t extend. Crossland ($500K) was supposed to replace Brailey.
- I think his mindset with each one of these spots (including hooker, once he pivoted to that with Crossland playing 13 now) was that he would look at young guys with a lot of potential he could marginally overpay now, who could potentially outplay their deal (Latu, Mooney, Pahulu, now Sandon all fit this), and if a true marquee star became available, he’d pay what it took to nail that one. If Tino Fa’asuamaleaui was making noise about being unhappy in January instead of now, I think there’s a real chance we’re dropping crazy money on him instead for example, and maybe looking at someone like Sandon to play in the halves after all. Because: he literally has to spend the money on something, and clearly what he doesn’t want to do is have contracts like the Hastings one.

I don’t know if that makes sense? What I mean is he literally had to spend big money on *something*, if he doesn’t take the big swing on elite talent, he’ll get to the end of the year and he’ll literally be forced to give dumb contracts to mid talent purely due to the cap rules. Gotta get over 95%.
 
I feel we will get Smith. I don’t believe he will play hooker. I think that was a Green or AOB decision to prevent issue within. It makes no sense to play a quality half at hooker. Sharpe is there by necessity. But he really could function at right centre. It is a truly stupid move if the only reason Smith goes to NQ is because we are too insistent to not play him where he belongs.
 
Yeah the more I think about it I agree. Smith seems an on the ball half. Yes Sharpe can play centre. Phoenix first stint in hooker than shifts into 13 when Aurthur comes on. It’s a more balanced side that way. I just think it’s too risky to go with Brown/Sharpe and Ponga combo.
 
Would Smith sign here before we have a new coach announced?

Eg. Holbrook could see him as a half. Green in all likelihood sees Sharpe and Brown as the halves, and smith doing a job at hooker.


Devils advocate here: Is there a world where we see Ponga in the centres?
 
I just worry so much about us making the same mistake yet again. Years of only intermittently getting the best out of Ponga due to not ever putting the right stuff around him.

As much as I bag Nathan Brown, he absolutely had it right the first time given the roster he had. You want to park true halves on Kalyn's inside who can manipulate the defensive line and bring him onto the ball in good positions. The way he set up in 2018, with Pearce playing through the middle third and Ponga & Watson posting up on opposite edges outside him - this is essentially what we ended up landing on when the attack showed signs of life this season, finally (I'm not counting easy W's vs decimated Bunnies/Panthers lineups, talking the wins vs Manly, Dolphins), with Ponga left, Sharpe right, Cogger/Crossland working through the middle third. Ponga and Watson seemed to have amazing chemistry as friends, but on a footy field you did not want one trying to facilitate the other. Similarly, separating Ponga and Sharpe seemed to help both.

Since that first year where he almost won the Dally M in a mediocre team just basically hammering that left edge, the same patterns have repeated over and over with us again: play him outside true halves who can help him work to his preferred looks, he looks like the single most dangerous player in the game. Play him outside utilities with limited ball playing ability, you get something which looks really clunky and awkward. Even outside very bleh halves like Cogger and Crossland, if they effectively compress the line and bring him onto the ball with wide man-on-man opportunities, he can just make **** happen.

Just don't see a recipe for the attack functioning next year without putting Brown in that on-ball roll Pearce & Hastings played, which is not his natural game - he excels as a running half playing down certain channels on one side of the field & bringing his outside men onto the ball. Which sounds like it could be incredibly dynamic, him and Ponga - I maintain that Brown is a very, very good NRL half - but you need another actual half to make that sort of split halves set up work. Where would we find something like that though? With so much money invested in the spine already, no less?

Well, Sandon being apparently gettable for like $450K if you just tell him he'll play in the halves... there it is, the golden ticket to bail us out of a really questionable situation which could end in calamity before it happens, if you ask me. The dude can play. He doesn't have the big boot we crave but otherwise he's good at the exact stuff you'd want a guy facilitating Brown & Ponga to be good at, but he's not just a totally unthreatening role player and facilitator, he's a dangerous runner, he has a step, he's shown flashes of very impressive skill in ad-lib situations. $450K for a half who's performed well in the NRL, who's 22 and still has scope to grow, is great value in any context even before you factor in the specific need we have. He is the best half available to talk to right now, the best half available for 2027 besides Metcalf (who'll surely be extended soon), and if you see a half available for 2028 who you think won't have already been re-signed by then, please name them.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top