Really interesting thing about the coaching landscape atm to me is that there are three head coaches all active at once who are hard to argue against as the best, most important, most iconic in their team's history - basically, that club's equivalent of Broncos Wayne Bennett. Bellyache, Cleary and Robbo. Whether or not these are clubs that are "bigger", have more resources, a better reputation, history tells you that the job of succeeding a coach like that is a poisoned chalice. The *best* case scenario for the next coach to take that job is that they maintain what their predecessor had going and never really get proper credit for what they achieve. The more likely scenario is that things get worse and you cop all the blame. You walked into a situation where winning over 50% of your games and going *pretty well* is unacceptable, failure. Post-Bennett Brisbane has been like post-Fergie Man Utd, if Reece Walsh didn't have enough of an emotional attachment to the club to crawl back through the supplicant's door they'd be the biggest joke in the NRL. I will be shocked if Melbourne doesn't go down a similar path when Craig retires. I will be shocked if Penrith's dominance doesn't also start to wane.
Holbrook can stay where he is, have a great shot at going down as *the* Newcastle Knights coach, what Bennett is to Brisbane and Craig is to Melbourne, keep this job till he retires and name his salary... or he can go somewhere else and always be regarded as, at best, a sequel.
Easy choice IMO. And he'd be rubbing his hands with glee about the playing group he's got atm. I guarantee he believes he's going to win premierships, plural.