How does the club stand in the way when family reasons are raised as the issue? And even if they weren't, any chance we force a contract to be completed and the bloke phones it in from there?
We've seen what happens with "principled" stands * when the Eels denied Lomax to the Storm; no matter what the offer, the end result was A) they got nothing, B) more importantly, changed nothing.
POS has been a great servant to this club, I'm sure they did the "Is there anything we can do to keep you?"....Parr's not stupid, but at the end of the day if he wants to go, he wants to go....hopefully the club management have learned the lessons he taught them: keep feeding young talent in at the bottom...move anyone on asap if they're not going to work out; you pay for key positions and to fill gaps....oh and no one, no matter how storied their career is bigger than the club and what the club needs rn.
* Not saying there's never a case for principled stands, but that pragmatism is usually by far the best approach.
PS. And as you say, the job's never done...so we were going to lose him at some stage.
Note "principled" is in quotes because clubs will always find excuses to move on players they want gone ....although tbf to the Eels have so far stuck by Fox when Gould had him out the door quicker than you can say NRL Integrity Unit.