Kurriboy
Danny 'Bedsy' Buderus
My old man blows up about this all the time. Why the short drop out, why not kick it 50m.
Well, for starters, the first tackle usually ends up around the 30m line anyway. So you only make 15 - 20m more. And defensively, it gasses you to have to sprint (or run sorta fast) 30m, then have to get back the full 10m over thr next few tackles. Makes it harder to defend due to the extra effort. It's much easier to defend closer to the line, regularly not even needing to retreat 10m because of the try line and having the chance to set your D line. It's also easier to attack against a retreating defensive line 20 - 30 out than it is 6m out against a set line (although this option opens up potential for kicks, barge over tries and forwards dragging a smaller player over the lone to score). Basically, short dropouts are easier to defend than long ones....
Totally agree re not contesting kicks at the other end though. When you have a play at the ball, we should at least be making the oppositions job harder by having a crack. Most teams at least have a pretend attempt to put the fullback off.
Yeah I agree thats the reasons for the short dropouts, I guess my point really was just that we contest all line dropouts down our end, vs not contesting all the kicks we can up their end.
On the taking the 2 (someone posted above about knowing we were done at this point) I thought that was absolutely the right call. The game at that point looked like a real arm wrestle and was clearly going to be a low scoring game. Skipping out to 8 points makes it a 2 score game for the opposition, and being fair to OB, we weren't really looking like scoring against them too convincingly.
Could just as easily taken the tap and walked away with nothing. The full set on their line at the death was a great example. We asked very little of them in defence.