Gonna get members on the Manly forum to pay for it
Brock Lamb suitors
- Thread starter Wobbles
- Start date
Wobbles
Evan Cochrane
Grandpa Joe
Danny 'Bedsy' Buderus
Kenny instead of writing forums with your ability to predict you should be writing horoscopes.
packo
:) (:
You should be able to like a post twice.
Wobbles
Evan Cochrane
Just wait until virtual reality and tactile gloves and sensors are readily available. You'd be able to send more than just a like
cowboyman
Danny 'Bedsy' Buderus
Attachments
Grandpa Joe
Danny 'Bedsy' Buderus
Serious questions who's got a face that's more like a haemoroid Trump or Rabs?
Wobbles
Evan Cochrane
Rabs is perpetually red, but Trump is way more annoying and dangerous to your health
Lockwire211
Nathan Ross
Once again another thread turned into garbage and nothing to do with the topic.
packo
:) (:
Start your own forum.
Yes, well I believe everything is in order
Kurriboy
Danny 'Bedsy' Buderus
Ok, your right.
So, who you reckon would have a better chance of landing brock lamb but also looks like a haemoroid Trump or Rabs?
My money is on Rabs!
7 sleeps to go. Can't wait.
Joel
Touche...
Are you in denial of our new attacking structure? Below you're indicating that we will use Pearce on both sides, but above you have your fingers in your ears thinking it's bs.
Joel
Touche...
Lol @ Kenny not replying to me calling out his bs.
I wonder how early it'll take for a decision to be made for Lamb? Because sorting out our backup halves for next year with Cogger out is pretty crucial when Pearce inevitably gets injured.
6. Stig
7. Hazard
9. Starling
^ Also even with Johns somewhere in the mix it isn't looking that good to me.
I wonder how early it'll take for a decision to be made for Lamb? Because sorting out our backup halves for next year with Cogger out is pretty crucial when Pearce inevitably gets injured.
6. Stig
7. Hazard
9. Starling
^ Also even with Johns somewhere in the mix it isn't looking that good to me.
Sorry hombre.. Please provide the context within which my first statement was made (not changing our style) and ill respond.
I dont remember why I said it, and i suspect you've cherry picked some part of what I said, which on its own is coming across not how l intended
But for what its worth, my position hasnt changed. And its quite simple. I like the attack centric mentality, the quick shift to the edges, the offloades etc. The bias for hard running players etc
What I have a bias against is the use of only one organisational half. I think any team on the planet would benefit from having two thinking, scheming halves rather than one. So naturally Id prefer to see Lamb in the side, and I dont think our style needs to change at all in accommodating that change
Though Im totally hoping that im proven wrong on Friday
What I have a bias against is the use of only one organisational half. I think any team on the planet would benefit from having two thinking, scheming halves rather than one. So naturally Id prefer to see Lamb in the side, and I dont think our style needs to change at all in accommodating that change
Though Im totally hoping that im proven wrong on Friday
Joel
Touche...
It's on page 2 on this thread which is hardly cherry picking. I was just catching up on the posts and it stuck out as being fairly out of touch.
Ok, so, as I suspected, you completely misunderstood what was said. I basically said that we dont need to change our playing style whether we have Watson or Lamb at 6.. That's it. Read my entire comment below:
"The only thing helping Watson is that he and Lamb are not a like-for-like swap. But my personal view on things is that Brown will see that two tacticians is better than one. And when given the chance Lamb will make an immense difference to the side
SPOILER we dont need to change our style. I think its bs assumption being perpetuated on here that is based on nothing"