Recent content by The yeller

But why would boyd's manager need to have futre talks if the deal was a done deal already ?

kent is like the rest of the telegraph , are giving opinions he did say unofficial means it may not be true The knights or dragons would have it up officially by now

what i heard was yesterday,was the deadline for him to sign.

the deadline was yesterday, if boyd hasnt put pen to paper, as i said sadly he isnt coming

sadly i think the deadline has probably has passed now Boyd isnt coming to newcastle,

actually a knights fan and souths

funny how souths got told they weren't allowed speak to boyd about signing with them in 2010 , had to wait to negotiate until in his final year which is this year

where is this mystrerious get out clause, when boyd only signed a 3 year deal not this magical 4 year deal with a get out clause luke with souths when he ws trying to stay with souths, agreed to Souths without his manager and the nrl will not allowed it until his manager is part of the negations

I know from october 2010 that the player must negotiate with his manger if there is another club wanting to sign him while under contract, still a bit suspicious about Boyd agreeing to the knights being valid

thats a new one to me , there was no reports of boyd signing anything like that

Just surprised , whether the agreement is vaild i dont know

Where has this get out clause come from , all i heard was Boyd has signed with the dragons for 3 years, the same time as Bennett there was no get out clause mention

who has Boyd If he had a get out clause wouldnt that mean he could have played for the knights this year if that was the case

is that legal , with a player who still has a year in his contract to agree with another club to accept a 4 year old deal was it his manager who gave the word

Been hearing Boyd to stay at the dragons 2 years with a third being optional