Just got to thinking today. There was always talk that Mullen was underrated and would have done well in a better team. This year It seems to me Pearce has done better with arguably a wooden spoon team (if you take himself and Ponga out) I did think it was funny all the talk about Cleary being solid in origin when he didn’t really do much against a weaker team than both Pearce and Mullen faced in SOS. I guess it just shows it’s hard to compare players in different teams. Thoughts?